New Developments In The Harvey Addicks And Barker Reservoir Case
New Developments In The Harvey Addicks And Barker Reservoir Case
A decision was announced on December 17, 2019 by the Judge in reservoir litigation in the United States court of Federal Claims in Washington, DC. The decision followed a 10 day trial that was held in Houston, TX starting May 6, 2019. This was the very first trial of the first 13 “test” or “bellwether” upstream properties (upstream of the Reservoirs) in this litigation.
The trial was split into two parts:
- Liability: Whether the United States is liable for the damages suffered by those flooded “upstream” of the Reservoirs.
- Damages: What damages are each property owner entitled to from the United States as a result of that flooding.
The Court agreed with the property owners that the United States was liable to them for an “uncompensated taking” of the upstream properties by the release of waters from the Reservoirs that were filled with floodwater from Harvey. That means that in these 13 upstream cases, the United States is liable for the damages suffered by those properties flooded north of or above the Reservoirs. The next step on this first trial is to determine the amount of damages due each of those upstream property owners.
The decision is regarding the upstream properties, only. A separate trial will have to be held to determine the United States’ liability for downstream property damages.
Please keep in mind that this trial and the others to come are NOT class actions. “Class Actions” are lawsuits where one or two plaintiffs file suit on behalf of all people who have a similar claim, and the success of a class action depends on the strength of those two plaintiff’s claims. While this recent trial involved a “grouping” of 13 “test” or “bellwether” cases, it was a trial of individually filed cases, just like yours, grouped together for the judicial economy and efficiency of having one trial. The success of each individually filed case depends on the strength of that case, only, as it will be evaluated on its own damages.
You can read the opinion by clicking here.
If you have any questions, please email us at Bob.Schwartz@bcoonlaw.com.
search
our offices
FROM THE BLOG
TEXAS LAWYER – Judge Spends 3 Hours Explaining His Decision
TEXAS LAWYER – January 17, 2025 – By Adolfo Pesquera A judge sympathetic to the hundreds of victims of the massive Port Neches refinery explosion was not able to convince the defendant corporation to pay $292 A proposed plea agreement between federal prosecutors and TPC Group that involved negotiations that excluded the crime victims, fell…
FEDERAL JUDGE LOWERS THE BOOM ON TPC FOR CRIMINAL CHARGES BROUGHT BY THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE / TPC WALKS
FEDERAL JUDGE LOWERS THE BOOM ON TPC FOR CRIMINAL CHARGES BROUGHT BY THE DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE / TPC WALKS On Friday, January 10, 2025, Federal Court Judge Michael Truncale called the attorneys representing the victims of the TPC refinery explosion case, TPC defense counsel and the Government prosecutors back to his courtroom so he could…
UPDATE ON TPC LITIGATION – TPC Withdraws from Plea Agreement
Beaumont — TPC has withdrawn from its plea agreement with the government during a federal sentencing hearing for the 2019 plant explosion and fire in Port Neches, based on the judge’s decision to increase restitution, and TPC is now prepared to go to trial. U.S. District Court Judge Michael Truncale held the hearing Friday at…